Overview
As you reflect on stakeholder feedback, your design team will need to select the one problem you will address via this process out of the many that have been raised. That requires you to think about what is most important to address, as well as what is most feasible to address. Remember that the design process focuses on one area for improvement at a time (though as you build your muscles with this process, you may be inclined to run multiple design cycles concurrently).
Framing the problem as an opportunity is key to garnering support and building buy-in for the work. Creating a “How might we?” statement is common in design thinking, as it helps to highlight the possibility in the change you seek. For example, framing a problem about student apathy and disengagement as, “How might we increase high schoolers’ engagement in core classes like math and literature?” is a simple way to turn a problem into an opportunity. This will help your team continue to prioritize creativity and to stay open to multiple potential solutions, while also garnering support for the project (as the old adage goes, you’ll catch more flies with honey).
You are viewing: What Is A Problem Of Practice
Steps to Implementation
Suggested time: 1-2 hours
- Gather your team in a room (in-person or virtual) with access to sticky notes or a digital alternative, such as Google Jamboard.
- Make sure your team has reflected on your district’s historical context and current data and has spoken with students, families, teachers, and classified staff. This will help you define a strong problem of practice.
- Review the key stories and themes your team identified from empathy interviews with stakeholders, and revisit the headlines from your research into your district’s historical context and current data.
- Discuss which themes are best to tackle through this design process, and choose one particular theme to focus on when designing a problem statement. Consider the following as you review each theme:
- Would solving this problem lead to greater equity and resiliency?
- Does it reflect what we have heard from our stakeholders?
- Is the problem the right size? That is, is it something ambitious, but that we can feasibly address?
- Ask each member of your design team to generate 2-3 problem statements based on the theme(s) identified.
- Start each question with, “How might we…?”
- Use clear, concise language.
- As a team, review, refine, and discuss your problem statements. A well-defined statement should consider the following:
- Are there many (10+) possible solutions?
- Is there a solution embedded in the question? Consider rewriting questions in a way that leaves them open to multiple possible solutions.
- Does the question use oppressive or deficit-based language? Consider rewriting questions to state the problem in empowering, asset-based language.
- Is the solution the right size? Try to avoid the bathtub (too small) and the ocean (too big).
- Can we remix or combine different “How might we?” statements to make a better one?
- Select the most compelling “How might we?” question as your chosen problem statement to guide further design work. To choose among the options, consider:
- Bringing draft problem statements to students, families, teachers, and classified staff to get their feedback and perspectives on which problems are most urgent and important to address.
- Use prioritization methods (like voting dots or allowing each team member to put a “+1” on the two problem statements they like most) to narrow the options with your team.
- Document your final problem statement.
- Next, you will brainstorm solutions to your problem of practice.
Read more : What To Wear For Horseback Riding
This activity was inspired by the How Might We…? method card from Stanford d.school.
This strategy is a part of TLA’s Real-Time Redesign release, a practical toolkit for improving equity and resiliency in schools. Explore the full guide to find additional strategies, insights, and resources.
Source: https://t-tees.com
Category: WHAT