The Bible and the Qur’an are two sacred texts that shape the beliefs and values of millions around the world. However, when it comes to historical accuracy, the Bible outshines the Qur’an. Let’s explore why.
Source Criticism: A Matter of Trustworthiness
One of the key factors that make the Qur’an less trustworthy is source criticism. Source criticism involves examining the reliability of the sources on which a text is based. In this regard, the Qur’an falls short.
You are viewing: The Reliability of the Bible vs. the Qur’an: Unveiling the Truth
For instance, the Qur’an recounts stories about Jesus that are derived from known fraudulent sources. Surah 19 presents the story of Jesus’ birth, where Mary seeks refuge under a palm tree and hears a voice assuring her of God’s provision. Miraculously, the tree provides her with dates and a flowing stream, bringing her comfort.
Read more : Which Book In The Bible Has The Least Chapters
This story, however, is absent from the Gospels, which were either written by eyewitnesses or based on accounts of Jesus’ life. Instead, we find this exact narrative, in almost the same detail, in the lost books of the Bible. These apocryphal fables were composed over a century after Jesus’ birth, making them highly unreliable. Furthermore, these books also present stories of Jesus speaking in full sentences as a baby and creating living birds from clay.
While the Gospel accounts offer no evidence of these stories, they are present in the apocryphal gospels, such as the First Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus Christ and the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. These texts, considered fakes, were written centuries after Jesus’ lifetime.
Borrowed Words from Dubious Sources
The Qur’an’s reliance on other sources becomes even more evident in Surah 5:32, which discusses the story of Cain and Abel. In this verse, a warning is given that killing one innocent person is as severe as killing all of humanity. Conversely, saving a life is as virtuous as saving all of humanity.
Read more : Which Is Better Focus Factor Or Prevagen
Interestingly, these words bear a striking resemblance to the commentary of a Jewish rabbi on Genesis 4:10, found in the Jewish literature of the Talmud. This commentary predates the Qur’an by four hundred years. The rabbi argues that the plural form of the Hebrew word for “blood” indicates that killing Abel, though an individual act, is morally equivalent to killing all of humanity.
The Qur’an, unintentionally or not, cites this mistaken commentary and presents it as divine revelation. Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the exclusive work of Allah, existing eternally in Heaven, without any human inspiration. Therefore, the inclusion of erroneous commentary from a Jewish rabbi raises doubts about the Qur’an’s trustworthiness.
In Search of Historical Accuracy
When assessing the historical reliability of sacred texts, it is crucial to critically examine their sources. In this regard, the Bible surpasses the Qur’an. The stories presented in the Qur’an find their origins in fraudulent and questionable sources, such as apocryphal gospels and mistaken interpretations. Conversely, the Bible draws from eyewitness accounts and reliable historical records.
While both books hold spiritual significance for their respective followers, the Bible stands as a more reliable historical document. It is grounded in factual evidence and written by those who witnessed the events firsthand.
Source: https://t-tees.com
Category: WHICH
